Monday, May 25, 2009

The Dark Arts of Torture

In her latest NY Times op-ed, Maureen Dowd takes another swipe at the various malfactors of torture:
Dick Cheney has done many dastardly things. But presiding over policies so saturnine that they ended up putting the liberal speaker from San Francisco on the hot seat about torture may be one of his proudest achievements.

Nancy Pelosi's bad week of blithering responses about why she did nothing after being briefed on torture has given Republicans one of their happiest -- and harpy-est -- weeks in a long time. They relished casting Pelosi as contemptible for not fighting harder to stop their contemptible depredations against the Constitution. That's Cheneyesque chutzpah.

The stylish grandmother acted like a stammering child caught red-handed, refusing to admit any fault and pointing the finger at a convenient scapegoat. She charged the C.I.A. with misleading Congress, which is sort of like saying the butler did it, or accusing a generic thuggish-looking guy in a knit cap with gang tattoos to distract from your sin.

Although the briefing was classified, she could have slugged it out privately with Bush officials. But she was busy trying to be the first woman to lead a major party. And very few watchdogs -- in the Democratic Party or the press -- were pushing back against the Bush horde in 2002 and 2003, when magazines were gushing about W. and Cheney as conquering heroes.

Leon Panetta, the new C.I.A. chief, who is Pelosi's friend and former Democratic House colleague from California, slapped her on Friday, saying that the agency briefers were truthful. And Jon Stewart ribbed that the glossily groomed speaker was just another ''Miss California U.S.A. who's also been revealing a little too much of herself.''

It's discomfiting to think that the woman who's making Joe Biden seem suave is second in line to the presidency.

Of course, a lot of the hoo-ha around Pelosi makes it sound as if she knew stuff that no one else had any inkling of, when in fact the entire world had a pretty good idea of what was happening. The Bushies plied their dark arts in broad daylight.

Besides, the question of what Pelosi knew or didn't, or when she did or didn't know, is irrelevant to how W. and Cheney broke the law and authorized torture.

Philip Zelikow, who was State Department counselor for Condi Rice and executive director of the 9/11 Commission, testified last week before Congress that torture was ''a collective failure and it was a mistake,'' perhaps ''a disastrous one.''

...

Ali Soufan, the ex-F.B.I. agent who flatly calls torture ''ineffective,'' helped get valuable information from Abu Zubaydah, an important Al Qaeda prisoner, simply by outwitting him. Torture, he told Congress, is designed to force the subject to submit ''through humiliation and cruelty'' and ''see the interrogator as the master who controls his pain.''

It's a good description of the bullying approach Cheney and Rummy applied to the globe, and the Arab world. But as Soufan noted, when you try to force compliance rather than elicit cooperation, it's prone to backfire.

...

In The Washington Note, a political and foreign policy blog, Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, Colin Powell's former chief of staff at State, wrote that the ''harsh interrogation in April and May of 2002 ... was not aimed at pre-empting another terrorist attack on the U.S. but discovering a smoking gun linking Iraq and Al Qaeda.''

More and more the timeline is raising the question of why, if the torture was to prevent terrorist attacks, it seemed to happen mainly during the period when the Bush crowd was looking for what was essentially political information to justify the invasion of Iraq.

I used to agree with President Obama, that it was better to keep moving and focus on our myriad problems than wallow in the darkness of the past. But now I want a full accounting. I want to know every awful act committed in the name of self-defense and patriotism. Even if it only makes one ambitious congresswoman pay more attention in some future briefing about some future secret technique that is ''uniquely'' designed to protect us, it will be worth it.
The Cheney slight-of-hand trick to move focus away from torture and onto Nancy Pelosi makes me sick. The Bush/Cheney years were filled with this kind of cynical political manipulation. They successfully kept the media focused on minor issues while they made the world a darker, meaner place. Cheney is the same guy who went on the Sunday talk shows calming assuring everyone that weapons of mass destruction would be found in Iraq. Cheney is the one who had Bush fly all over kingdom come on 9/11 as if there were some spiffy technology that would allow a bunch of bearded religious nuts hiding in Afghanistan to track and shoot down a presidential plane.

The real joke on 9/11 was that Bush lamely read the book "My Pet Goat" as the US was attacked and then when his entourage finally left to get him to a "command centre" the presidential motorcade got lost and had to backtrack, pitiful!

The Katrina catastrophe showed Bush/Cheney as cynical as Nero fiddling while Rome burned. The push to torture to "prove" links between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda showed the kind of murderous monomania that rules in those dark years.

So having Cheney come back and use his swave voice and assured manner to sell his poisonous arts yet again is disgusting. And to she him succeed so effortlessly is frightening.

No comments: